Saturday, August 1, 2009

Sick Fuck of the Week


Click on the arrow...


It's that time of the week again when we roll out the red carpet for the evil and the deranged with the Sick Fuck of the Week award.

Women ruled this week, showing they're as capable as men of committing unspeakable atrocities. We have a baby eater, a baby snatcher and a baby...whatchamacallit...baker? The nominees are:
  • The 33-year-old woman from San Antonio, Texas, who chopped and decapitated her 3 1/2-week-old baby with a knife, sword and machete, ripped his face off, ate three of his toes and part of his brain. When police arrived, they found Otty Sanchez on the couch, bleeding from two self-inflicted stab wounds to the torso and throat, and screaming that she killed her baby because the devil told her to do it. Word is she's schizophrenic and was suffering from postpartum depression or psychosis and not taking her meds.
  • The 35-year-old woman who claimed as hers a baby that was cut out of an 8-month-pregnant woman in Worcester, Mass. So far Julie Corey has been charged with kidnapping, not yet murder, but word is she faked a pregnancy for several months prior to showing up with the baby. Cops found Darlene Haynes, said to be mentally handicapped and the mother of three other children, dead in a closet after neighbors complained of a stench emanating from her apartment.
  • The 27-year-old woman from Lowell, Mass., who made a habit of locking her 3-year-old son in a sealed attic covered--both the boy and the attic--in urine and feces. After an anonymous call, police officers found him naked in the 100-plus-degree attic, where he had been for at least an hour and where his mother repeatedly kept him. Kristen Paquette's father said it wasn't her fault that the boy is combative and has chronic lung disease and ADHD. The uncle said the attic treatment was "no abuse, no abuse whatsoever" but a way to get control. The woman has three other children from various men.
If we were to reward evil, the baby snatcher would come on top. If we were to focus on sickness or twistedness, the psychotic baby eater would win hands down.

Hmm...what to do, what to do? Nah, there's no contest --


Congratulations to sick fuck Otty Sanchez, winner of this week's Sick Fuck of the Week award
.

Baby Eater Otty Sanchez from San Antonio, Texas

Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Healthcare industry spends big on lobbyists


It's no surprise that healthcare companies are pouring millions of dollars in lobbying to influence how legislators will vote on President Obama's healthcare reform.

Pharmaceutical companies, doctors, insurers and hospitals are the leading spenders, Reuters reported.

Here is a look at some of the biggest spenders so far according to Senate reports:

- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers, $6.1 million.

- Pfizer, $5.6 million

- American Medical Association, $3.8 million.

- Eli Lilly, $ 3.6 million

- Amgen, $3.4 million.

- Blue Cross/Blue Shield, 2.8 million.

- GlaxoSmithKline, $2.3 million.

- Novartis, $1.8 million.

- MetLife Group, $1.7 million.

- Allstate, $1.5 million.

- Merck & Co. $1.5 million.

Source: Reuters
Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Robin Williams on Inside the Actor's Studio (1-2)


One of--if not
the--funniest spectacle I've ever seen is comedian Robin Williams as the guest of Bravo's Inside the Actor Studio.

It is here that you can see the scope of this man's innate and infinite genius. If you haven't seen this, you simply must.

The YouTube videos are short, ranging from two-plus minutes to around 10 minutes. So the show is divided into 14 parts, or videos. Here are Part 1 (insanely funny stuff before James Lipton can even get a word in) and 2 (Robin answers questions, among other things, about his early life).

Enjoy.






Source: YouTube

Musicpost: Blind Faith's 'Can't Find My Way Home'


After "I Can See Clearly Now" I started thinking about other songs that are among my all-time favorites and decided to start posting them from here on.

"Can't Find My Way Home" was released in 1969 by the English blues-rock band Blind Faith, whose one and only album, Blind Faith, climbed to No. 1 on Billboard's charts in the U.S. and U.K. In case you're not familiar with this group, I'll just say that Eric Clapton and Steve Winwood were in it, and that Clapton is a god.

I first heard this song while watching the 1993 film "Benny & Joon" starring Johnny Depp, Mary Stuart Masterson and Aidan Quinn. Joe Coker's version of it plays when Aidan Quinn's character is undergoing the predictable transforming moment towards the end of movie. He spends an uncharacteristically blue night wandering around the railroad tracks, tormented about what to do with his life. I loved the movie, by the way, (definitely worth watching), but better yet, I found one of my soulmate songs.

This is the kind of song, like other all-time favorites, that I can't listen to just once. I have to play it repeatedly for about an hour until I'm satisfied enough to let it go. It's in the lyrics ... and the melody ... and the guitar ... and the voice -- together, they're magic, at least to me.

The video includes both the acoustic and electric versions of the song. The electric one (second in the video) is OK, but the acoustic version is the one I can fixate on for hours. Enjoy.




Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Friday, July 31, 2009

Music downloader ordered to pay $675K

This has got to suck.

A graduate student from Providence, R.I., who illegally downloaded and distributed 30 songs six years ago has been ordered to pay $675,000 in damages to four record labels.

For 30 songs he shared with friends. Ouch!

When Joel Tenenbaum faced trial
for copyright infringement, he tried to settle the case for $5,000, but the offer was rejected and a Boston jury hit him with the hefty fine.

The 25-year-old Boston University graduate student is the second American to be taken to trial for illegally downloading music.

Tenenbaum reportedly has said he's grateful he wasn't ordered to pay millions of dollars but will have to file for bankruptcy if the verdict stands. He plans to appeal because he was not allowed to ague the case based on fair use.

During the trial, Tim Reynolds, a lawyer for the recording labels, called Tenenbaum "a hardcore, habitual, long-term infringer who knew what he was doing was wrong."

Tenenbaum (right)--who was described as "a hardcore, habitual, long-term infringer who knew what he was going was wrong" by a lawyer for the record labels--admitted he downloaded and shared songs by rock groups Green Day, Nirvana, and The Smashing Pumpkins, among others.

More than 30,000 people have settled similar cases for amounts ranging from $3,000 to $12,000, ABC News reported.

In 2007, Jammie Thomas-Rasset of Minnesota was the first person to be sued by record companies seeking damages for the illegal download and sharing of music files. She was ordered to pay $1.92 million to the labels, but her attorney says she doesn't have the money to for the damages and is asking for a new trial, according to the report.

I get it. The record companies have to make money--not good money, BIG money. But given the nearly endless opportunities the Internet offers music lovers, the labels are fighting a losing battle, if you ask me.

Source: ABC News
Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Mom keeps boy locked in 100-degree-plus attic


Booking photo of Kristen Paquette (right) released by the Lowell Police Department.

Sick fuck alert.

Police officers found a naked boy, covered in urine and feces, locked in an airless attic where the temperature was over 100 degrees. The boy also had several minor bumps on his forehead.

(Depending on the news source, the boy is either three or five years old.)

Police said the attic was covered in human feces and there were several children's finger markings along the wall, made with excrement, that appeared to have been there for a considerable amount of time, the Boston Globe reported. There was one window in the attic and it was locked with nails to the window sill.

The boy's 27-year-old mother is facing charges, her apartment has been condemned as unsanitary, and her four children have been taken away from her, the Boston Globe reported citing a police statement.

Kristin Paquette pleaded not guilty today in Lowell District Court to charges of assault and battery on a child causing bodily injury and reckless endangerment of a child under 18. She was ordered held on $10,000 cash bail.

"This is certainly sensational, but also a tragic and sad situation. She's a woman who needed help but didn't know how to ask for it,'' said the mother's attorney, Kathleen Moore, who unsuccessfully urged the judge to release Paquette without bail.

Police said that they received an anonymous call at about 2:43 p.m. Thursday alerting them to a young child in the attic of 15 Lenox St. When police asked how long her son had been in the attic, Paquette "replied with a very nonchalant manner and tone, 'maybe an hour or so. I'm not too sure'," according to the police report.

Paquette told police that she had put her son in the attic because she could not control him and he would "interrupt cleaning" when she was trying to clean the apartment, the newspaper reported.

Paquette's 6-year-old son told police that his brother "was bad so Mommy put him upstairs and changed the door handle." The boy said it wasn't the first time his brother had been locked in the attic and that it happened "a lot."

As they walked to the staircase that led to the attic, police officers noticed the hallway was completely filthy and the floor could not be seen because of piles of spoiled food, trash and clothing. Outside the attic was a similarly filthy mattress, surrounded by hundreds of flies, prosecutor Dan Harren said.

The Department of Children and Families took custody of all four of Paquette's children; the other three are 5, 6, and 9, according to the newspaper report.

Blindness, stupidity or malice?

Alfred Paquette, the woman's father, said his daughter "is not an evil person like they tried to make her out to be. She has a child that needs special help.''

Well, tossing him in a sweltering attic, naked and covered with crap is a kind "special" treatment--isn't it? Jeez.

He said his grandson had a chronic lung disease, suffers from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and acts "like a child on steroids.'' He added that his daughter is a single mother, struggling to raise her children alone without any help from their fathers, and has been trying unsuccessfully to get help for the boy.

Tell me, what's up with parents being so fucking deluded about their kids? Does having children disable some sort of internal objectivity mechanism? How can anyone, especially a close relative, see a child being kept under such inhumane conditions and not react to help him? Looks like the granpa is another sick fuck; he probably locked his kids the attic, too.

"It's not all her fault or his, she was just totally overwhelmed,'' he said. "She had a hard time dealing with him because he was very combative."

This woman--evidently an unfit mother--has four kids from different fathers that she can't handle. How is that not her fault? Ever hear of condoms?

Paquette said the boy "comes down late at night and throws food around and he fights with his brothers and he bangs his head against walls. That's probably why he had bumps on his head.''

I would be bumping my head against the wall, too, if I were sauteeing on piss and shit in a stinking hot attic.

He noted that he had been at his daughter's apartment earlier in the day Thursday when he picked up his 9-year-old grandson to take him to a Red Sox game, and that the 3-or-5-year old boy "just came downstairs and he was fine. There was absolutely no problem.''

Right.

Richard Paquette, the woman's uncle, said there was nothing wrong with disciplining out-of-control children. "You've got to try to get some kind of control. There's no abuse, no abuse whatsoever," he said.

Sigh.

It must be news week in Massachusetts: a baby snatcher kills a pregnant woman and cuts out a fetus in Worcester; Sgt. Crowley from the Cambridge Police has beer with President at the White House; dumb Boston cop calls Gates a "banana-eating jungle monkey" but insists he's not a racist, and now this sick fuck in Lowell. Yikes!

Source: The Boston Globe
Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Babies dropped from shrine roof in India


Hundreds of infants were dropped from the roof of a Muslim shrine in western India today. The 700-year-old ritual is based on the belief that the fall ensures good health and prosperity for the families. Putting the danger of the fall aside--I say the fall is more likely to ensure the kids will be panic-wired for life. But, who knows...


Watch CBS Videos Online

Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Stew of News - spooning and scooping 'em for ya

  • The fat acceptance movement - Let's accept the joys of a hot fudge brownie sundae with mudpie ice cream, fresh whipped cream and tons of roasted almonds.

Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Musicpost: 'I Can See Clearly Now' by Nash, Cliff


This is one of my favorite songs of all time. It's a Johnny Nash song, but most people have only heard the Jimmy Cliff version.

Johnny Nash wrote and recorded this song in 1972. Within 20 weeks, it rose to the top of the charts.




Jimmy Cliff recorded it in 1993 for the movie "Cool Runnings." I chose the following clip because it's just about the song vs. the other video, which shows distracting scenes from the movie.




Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Banks paid $32.6-bil in bonuses amid U.S. bailout


Here's an important article about what Wall Street banks are doing with the money they robbed from you and me. I meant to post this yesterday but procrastinated.

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo

By Karen Freifeld

July 30 (Bloomberg) -- Citigroup Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co. and seven other U.S. banks paid in 2008 while receiving $175 billion in taxpayer funds, according to a report by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo.

Cuomo analyzed 2008 bonuses at nine banks that received Trouble Asset Relief Program financing from the U.S. government. New York-based Citigroup and Merrill, which has since been taken over by Bank of America Corp., received TARP funding totaling $55 billion, Cuomo said.

“When the banks did well, their employees were paid well. When the banks did poorly, their employees were paid well,” Cuomo’s office said in the 22-page report. “When the banks did very poorly, they were bailed out by taxpayers and their employees were still paid well. Bonuses and overall compensation did not vary significantly as profits diminished.” Ugh!

The study, called “No Rhyme or Reason: The ‘Heads I Win, Tails You Lose’ Bank Bonus Culture,” comes as Congress and the Securities and Exchange Commission examine whether to limit the compensation paid to top corporate executives. (I'm digging that title. It's perfect.)

“One senior bank executive noted recently that individual compensation should not be set without taking into strong consideration the performance of the business unit and the overall firm,” according to the Cuomo report.

Upside, Downside

“As this executive put it, ‘employees should share in the upside when overall performance is strong and they should all share in the downside when overall performance is weak.” But despite such claims, one thing is clear from this investigation to date: there is no clear rhyme or reason to the way banks compensate and reward their employees,” the report said.

Wall Street firms’ pay has traditionally been tied closely to performance of the companies, which is why employees receive most of their compensation at the end of the year after final results are known. Depending on seniority and performance, bonuses for traders, bankers and executives can be a multiple of their salaries, which range from about $80,000 to $600,000.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase & Co. paid out a total of $18 billion in bonuses in 2008 while receiving a combined total of $45 billion in taxpayer dollars through TARP. Together, the three firms earned $9.6 billion last year, Cuomo said.

Jesus F. Xst--criminal, if you ask me.

Top Recipients

The top 200 bonus recipients at JPMorgan Chase & Co. received $1.12 billion last year, while the top 200 at Goldman received $995 million. At Merrill the top 149 received $858 million and at Morgan Stanley, the top 101 received $577 million. Those 650 people received a combined $3.55 billion, or an average of $5.46 million.

JPMorgan Chase had 1,626 employees who received a bonus of least $1 million last year, more than any other Wall Street firm, according to the report. Goldman Sachs had 953 employees who received $1 million or more in bonuses, while Citigroup Inc. had 738, Merrill Lynch & Co., 696, and Morgan Stanley, 428. Bank of America Corp. had 172, while Wells Fargo & Co. had 62.

This is sooo disgusting to me. Here we are, facing a fucked up economy that is ruining countless lives, and these fuckers are having a blast with our--We the People's--money, which was given to them to "save" their crappy, ineffective, poorly managed companies all while they and the employees of these shitty companies get rewarded for their shitty performance. Where's the incentive to do a better job?

Kristin Lemkau, a spokeswoman for JPMorgan Chase, Mark Lake, a spokesman at Morgan Stanley, Jeep Bryant, a spokesman for Bank of New York Mellon, and Michael Du Vally, a spokesman at Goldman Sachs, all in New York, declined to comment. Carolyn Cinchon, a spokeswoman for State Street, and Citigroup spokesman Stephen Cohen didn’t immediately return a call for comment.

What a pack of wimps. If they're doing nothing wrong, as the companies claim, why do they hide?

Pay for Performance

Melissa Murray a spokeswoman for Wells Fargo, declined comment on the report itself. She said the company has a “pay- for-performance” culture where staff are compensated on individual and business performance. “We implemented a say on pay policy this year and our shareholders approved the compensation of the Company’s named executives,” she said.

Citigroup and Merrill Lynch suffered losses of more than $27 billion at each firm, the report said. Yet Citigroup paid out $5.33 billion and Merrill $3.6 billion in bonuses.

Thieves.

“We have put forth guidelines to better link pay to long term performance and effective risk management,” said Travis Larson, a spokesman for the Washington-based Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. “That includes the ability to recover bonuses from employees if those bonuses turn out later to be improper.” The industry association put out its guidelines in June and member firms are working to incorporate them, he said.

Wall Street Pay

The report shows the more bonus-laden compensation styles of the four major Wall Street banks compared with retail banks such as Wells Fargo & Co. and Bank of America that employ far more people whose main compensation is typically salaries.

Bonuses averaged $160,420 for Goldman Sachs’s 30,067 employees, compared with $13,580 at Bank of America, employer of 243,000 people, the report said. Bonuses averaged $95,286 per employee at Morgan Stanley, $61,017 at Merrill Lynch and $38,642 at JPMorgan Chase & Co., which operates large retail and investment banking units.

At Wells Fargo, the fourth largest bank holding company after acquiring Wachovia Corp. last year, bonuses averaged $3,479 for the company’s 281,000 workers, according to the report.

Goldman produced the most in earnings per employee -- $77,228. In contrast, Merrill had the worst revenue performance, losing $467,797 per employee in 2008 while handing out an average bonus of $61,017, the third highest payout, the report said.

“The data that the attorney general has extracted is far more granular and detailed than anything that we might get from financial filings from these firms, so it’s extremely interesting in that respect,” said Paul Hodgson, a senior research associate for executive compensation at The Corporate Library in Portland, Maine. “The SEC may have a stronger platform to argue for disclosure of compensation for employees that earn in excess of a certain amount.”

Goldman Sachs building in New York City

TARP Pay-Back

Goldman and Morgan Stanley, credit-card lender American Express and custody banks State Street Corp., Bank of New York Mellon Corp. and Northern Trust Corp. paid back a combined $30 billion in TARP funds on June 17, in a step toward eliminating government restrictions on lending and compensation. JPMorgan Chase paid back $25 billion.

The U.S. House Financial Services Committee, led by Massachusetts Democrat Barney Frank, approved legislation two days ago that would let regulators ban incentive pay at banks and give shareholders a vote on bonuses in response to public outrage over Wall Street pay.

Egregious Behavior

The bill, which needs approval from the House and Senate, would allow banking agencies and the Securities and Exchange Commission to bar compensation practices that push financial companies to take “inappropriate risks.”

Frank said today in a telephone interview that the House tomorrow [July 31] will consider his legislation to allow shareholders to hold an annual, non-binding vote on executive pay and require regulators to set pay restrictions that prevent excessive risk taking.

“Attorney General Cuomo’s report on executive pay at companies receiving taxpayer bailouts is shocking and appalling,” said House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Edolphus Towns, a Democrat from New York. “Companies that only months ago were facing bankruptcy and sought the help of the Federal government are now paying out billions in compensation -- and in some cases without reimbursing taxpayers. This egregious behavior proves that Wall Street still doesn’t get that times have changed and the old way of paying executives is long gone.”

Part of Their Lives

Towns said in a letter to Cuomo that he would hold a hearing after the August recess to examine the Obama administration’s reforms in pay practices at companies that received TARP funds.

In October, industry veterans including John Gutfreund, president of New York-based Gutfreund & Co. and the former chief executive officer of Salomon Brothers Inc., said Wall Street would insist on paying bonuses in the face of the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, a taxpayer bailout and mounting political outcry.

Odds that Wall Street will forgo the payouts are “slim to none,” Gutfreund said in October. “They’re going to have to be a little bit sensitive because politicians, whether they like it or not, are part of their lives now.”

Shatner recites Sarah Palin's poetic tweets


A few nights ago Tonight Show host Conan O'Brien and actor William Shatner boldly went to where no man has gone before--a place in which Sarah Palin's ramblings made sense.

Last night, the duo did it again. This time, Captain Kirk recited the tweets of the Quitter from Alaska. Tweets are short text messages on the social networking website Twitter.

The result speaks for itself. Enjoy.




I found quotes from Shatner somewhere in NBC's webpages. I never knew he was funny until the Priceline commercials. Turns out he's a riot.

"Star Trek was originally supposed to be a show about a bunch of rabbis in a synagogue. I said to the producers, 'instead of a synagogue, how about if the show is in outer space?' They said, 'okay.' That's pretty much how it happened."

"I tell people I have a 34-inch waist, but it's really 35."

"How do I stay so healthy and boyishly handsome? It's simple. I drink the blood of young runaways."

Sources: NBC
Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Was it happy hour at the Beer Summit?

From left: VP Biden, Prof. Gates, Sgt. Crowley and President Obama (Alex Brandon/AP)

We don't know exactly what was discussed during the highly anticipated Obama-Gates-Crowley Beer Summit near the White House's Rose Garden today.

What we do know is that Vice President Joe Biden participated as well, and that President Obama drank Bud Light, VP Biden chose Bucklers, Harvard Prof. Henry Gates had a cold Adams Light and Sgt. James Crowley stuck to his favorite, Blue Moon. They also nibbled on peanuts and pretzels.

The beers were served in cold mugs.

Crowley and Gates wore dark suits for the occasion, while Obama and Biden kept their coats off.

How's that for award-winning political reporting?

We also know that Obama told reporters this was not a "beer summit."

"I noticed this has been called the 'Beer Summit.' It's a clever term, but this is not a summit, guys," Obama told reporters earlier.

"This is three folks having a drink at the end of the day, and hopefully giving people an opportunity to listen to each other. And that's really all it is. This is not a university seminar," he added, noting that
he was"fascinated with the fascination about this evening."

The goal is to lower the temperature on an event that has become too hyped and symbolic, Obama said, noting that they would try to reduce the "anger and hyperbole," and promote "self-reflection."


Reporters stood 50 feet from the Fantastic Four and were escorted out two minutes into the meeting.

In typical politically correct, puritanistic American fashion, there are some--you know, those who get off on finding the negative and offensive in every situation, regardless of how absurd it is to central issue--who are questioning if the Beer Summit is sending "the wrong message" about the use of alcohol. Ugh!

UPDATE: The White House released the following statement from President Obama after the summit:

"I am thankful to Professor Gates and Sergeant Crowley for joining me at the White House this evening for a friendly, thoughtful conversation. Even before we sat down for the beer, I learned that the two gentlemen spent some time together listening to one another, which is a testament to them. I have always believed that what brings us together is stronger than what pulls us apart. I am confident that has happened here tonight, and I am hopeful that all of us are able to draw this positive lesson from this episode."

Sgt. Crowley held a press conference after the event. He said Gates and he didn't spend much talking about the past but "a lot of time discussing the future." Below are some of his statements:

- "What we have here is two gentlemen who agree to disagree." - We had a cordial and productive discussion today." - "It was a private discussion, it was a frank discussion, and I'd rather not go into specifics." - "This was a positive step moving forward for the whole country." - "We do have a venue in mind for a second discussion." - "There was no tension." - "It's business, but discussing it like gentlemen instead of in the physical sense or in the court of public opinion."

As to the so-called "teaching moment" that news anchors are trying to figure out, I think it's quite clear: dialogue. I see learning in the exchange of perspectives on this and any controversial topic. I see value in healthy discussion vs. irrational bullying.

By the way, I think this would've NEVER taken place in Bush's White House. Bush would've chuckled at Crowley's suggestion to have a beer with Gates; said "yeah, sure," and blown it off. Actually, most likely Bush would've never been asked to comment on the matter while giving a press conference on health care. Obama was sucked into it because he's black...if you ask me.

For background info, check out these previous posts:

Obama-Gates-Crowley Beer Summit scheduled
, posted yesterday; Cop to Obama: 'Let's have a beer with Gates', posted July 24; Gates accepts invite for beer with Obama, Crowley, posted July 25

Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Racial-slurring Boston cop says he's not a racist


Only his mama would believe him.

Justin Barrett (right), the Boston police officer who sent a mass e-mail calling Harvard Prof. Henry Louis Gates Jr. a "banana-eating jungle monkey" has apologized, saying he's not a racist.

Are you fucking kidding me? I'm not racially touchy, and even I can see that that remark couldn't possibly be taken any other way.

"I regret that I used such words," Barrett told CNN affiliate WCVB-TV. "I have so many friends of every type of culture and race you can name. I am not a racist." Sure you're not.

He regrets it because he's about to lose his job. But he's toast. Banana-eating jungle monkey? WTF!

Barrett was placed on administrative leave after allegedly sending the mass e-mail to his National Guard buddies and the Boston Globe (what a dunce!) in which he vented about a July 22 Globe column on the Gates arrest, and he might lose his job as a result.

Yesterday I said that putting the racial issue aside, this guy should get fired for being this stupid. No one this dumb should carry a weapon and be in a position to arrest people. (See Dumb Boston cop fired for racist email re: Gates.)

I can't wait to see him explain how his jungle-monkey remarks are not racist tonight at Larry King Live. Surely, a lawyer will be sitting next to him or off camera.

I used to live in Massachusetts. I've heard about the monkeys, which were usually described as "swinging off trees" by the "non"-racist people when talking about black people. Trust me--it's 100% racial.

In a news conference held Thursday morning, Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davis denounced the e-mail, CNN reported.

"We have a relationship to maintain with the community," he said. "Police officers certainly have First Amendment rights, but they can't cross the line. I believe this crosses the line."

Davis said he spoke with Gates, who was "gracious and incredibly thankful that we took action."

Gates, a top African-American scholar, was arrested on July 16 by Sgt. James Crowley of the Cambridge Police for disorderly conduct after the officer responded to a 911 call reporting a possible home invasion of Gates Cambridge home. The charge later was dropped.

The controversial incident sparked a national debate about racial profiling in which even President Obama got involved. (See Obama-Gates-Crowley Beer Summit scheduled, posted yesterday. For background and additional information, click on the links for earlier stories at the end of the post.)

Globe columnist Yvonne Abraham supported Gates' actions, asking readers, "Would you stand for this kind of treatment, in your own home, by a police officer who by now clearly has no right to be there?"

In Barrett's e-mail, which was posted on a Boston TV station's website, he stated that if he had "been the officer [Gates] verbally assaulted like a banana-eating jungle monkey, I would have sprayed him in the face with OC [oleoresin capsicum, or pepper spray] deserving of his belligerent non-compliance."

Barrett used the "jungle monkey" phrase four times, three times referring to Gates and once referring to Abraham's writing as "jungle monkey gibberish," CNN reported.

One time and he might have been able to tip-toe around with some insanely concocted excuse. But four times? He's toast.

Barrett also said that he was "not a racist but I am prejudice [sic] towards people who are stupid and pretend to stand up and preach for something they say is freedom but it is merely attention because you do not get enough of it in your little fear-dwelling circle of on-the-bandwagon followers."

And he apologized last night? What for? An apology alone does not change a man's character.

Barrett's comments were taken out of context, said his attorney, Peter Marano. So it's my and everyone else's fault because we're idiots who either can't read or can't understand what we read. Right.

"Officer Barrett did not call professor Gates a jungle monkey or malign him racially," Marano said. "He said his behavior was like that of one. It was a characterization of the actions of that man." Or a monkey...

Um...I don't think that will fly.

Davis wants Barrett, a two-year member of the Boston police, fired, a source close to the investigation said. But he will continue to be paid while on leave, and no date has been set for his termination hearing, CNN reported.

UPDATE: As expected, Barrett appeared on Larry King Live sitting closely to his lawyer, who took it upon himself to answer for the cop several times until Larry cut him off.

Before answering any questions, Barrett again repeated what he had memorized of the apology given earlier today. It sounded rehearsed. "I'm not racist," he said once or twice during that introduction.

Alrighty. Then, why did you apologize for what you said if it wasn't a racist comment?

Larry asked one really smart and crucial question: "Have you ever used that language before."

Take a guess at what the cop said. You got it.

"No, I have never used those words before."

There's no way he hasn't, and now he's fucked because someone will come out of the woodwork and show up on Larry King to reveal that he or she has heard Barrett use that term before.

After another interruption from the lawyer, Larry wisely pressed on, asking the cop what then made him choose those words--"banana-eating jungle monkey"--if he's never used that kind of language before.

"I don't even know ... I couldn't tell you ... I have no idea," Barrett said.

Are you kidding me? How can he not know whether or not he's ever said something like banana-eating jungle monkey? He has no idea? Right. I tell you what, if that's the case, then in addition to racist and dumb, he's also a forgetful flake--another reason to keep him off the force, if you ask me.

This dunce sat down and composed a letter he expected an editor at the Boston Globe to take seriously and possibly publish. He was so proud of it, he also sent it out via a mass email to friends at the National Guard.

Writing such a letter forces the writer to pay more attention to word choice than when merely speaking the words, which often happens a bit too soon after thoughts emerge, so we "speak before we think" and end up regretting our words. It happens to all of us. It happened to Obama when he said, "the Cambridge police acted stupidly" arresting Gates in his own house.

"There was no intentional racism or bigotry in my words," Barrett said. "I did not intend that."

Then, what exactly did you intend, and what did you think those words would communicate?

The truth is he does know, he could tell us but chooses not to, and he does have an idea. Of course he does. But what is he gonna say--"yes, I've used that language before"? Of course not, because that would mean he's a racist, which he vehemently denies.

If he tells the truth, he's fucked. If he lies, he's fucked. Basically, he's toast.


"I treat people with dignity and respect ... I'm not a racist."

This guy could use his own "teaching moment," if you ask me.


Source: CNN
Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Popularity contest in cancer funding sucks

Cancer survivors like Rick Bans, inset, say some high-profile cancers get an unfair share of funding per patient. (ABC News Photo Illustration)

Kudos to ABC for doing this story. Just yesterday I was thinking about writing about this issue (and probably will, eventually) because, like the man in this story, I'm irked by this situation--not only when dealing with the attention different types of cancer get, but even more so when it comes to other devastating diseases that get next to no attention because it's all about the cancer and the heart disease and diabetes.

By Lauren Cox
ABC News Medical Unit
July 30, 2009

Of all things you don't want to turn into a popularity contest, cancer funding is one of them.

Rick Bangs, 51, likes to point out that the cancer he survived is the fifth most common cancer in the U.S. and the fourth most common cancer among men. But back in 2006 when he saw blood in his urine, neither he, nor his primary care doctor, considered bladder cancer for several months.

"I didn't push it," said Bangs. "At the time, I was back to what the general practitioner said and the urologist said, 'yeah, it could have been from your prostate'. It never crossed my mind that it might be cancer. That's kind of naive, but that's the way it is," he said.

Five weeks after his diagnosis, Bangs had his bladder removed and a neobladder made from intestinal tissue. He has to empty it every four hours--day or night--for the rest of his life.

But what irks Bangs isn't the hassle with a neobladder. After researching his cancer, Bangs discovered that bladder cancer fell into some of the silent cancers in America--ones that are common and deadly, but don't receive the same amount of attention and money as some highly publicized cancers.

Take, for example, lung cancer. It is the most common cancer in the U.S. and a very deadly one, but it gets an average amount of funding-- $1,128 per new person diagnosed last year--from the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Breast cancer, on the other hand, is ranked No. 3 in new cases last year and received $2,976 per new case. Leukemia ranks ninth in new cases and got $4,831 per new case in 2008. However, bladder cancer, which ranks fifth, got around $340 per new case. That means the fifth most common cancer ranks 19th in funding.

Exactly.

I'm grateful for breast cancer research and the countless of lives that have been saved because of it, yet at the same time I'm kind of sick of pink ribbons. I'm tired of hearing so much about breast cancer and so little about other conditions.

Rallies and walks (like the one shown in the photo below), awareness weeks, celebrities and politicians sponsoring association after association, asking for donations, doing TV ads...breast cancer this, breast cancer that, breast cancer songs, even a breast cancer dance. One of last week's dance routines on So You Think You Can Dance was a contemporary piece about, you guessed, breast cancer. All the judges were crying, and viewers politically correctly voted for the two dancers involved, resulting in the best female dancer--who didn't get to dance in a cancer piece--getting kicked out.

To me, breast cancer has become too cliche.

Oh, by the way, my sister got diagnosed with breast cancer last year. So it's not like I'm insensitive to it. It just bothers me to see so much attention and resources going to this one type of cancer just because that's what's in, while others equally or more deadly ones are ignored.

In private money and special funding from the U.S. Department of Defense and the disparities between number of cancer victims and number of dollars grows.

"Bladder cancer doesn't have a strong patient advocacy group unlike the Komen foundation for breast cancer or Lance Armstrong's foundation for testicular cancer," said Dr. Edouard J. Trabulsi, associate professor of urology in the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia.

Chicken or the Egg: Who Gets Cancer Research Funding?

"There's nothing all that new or exciting on the treatment front. Is that the chicken or the egg, where if there was more money there would be more research, I don't know," Trabulsi added. "But bladder cancer is sort of an orphan stepchild at least in urology-oncology."

Bangs, and other bladder cancer advocates say the difference is unfair. But those at cancer funding centers say doling out dollars cancer by cancer is not the best model. Rather, paying by scientific promising ideas saves the most lives in all cancers.

"Obviously, as a survivor, I think at least it should be equitable. There has been no forward progress in the treatment of bladder cancer in quite some time," said Bangs, who is a volunteer for the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network.

But Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, points out that when it comes to funding cancer, funding the most promising ideas can help any cancer.

"You actually pursue the easiest scientific opportunities because you don't want to be criticized of wasting the money," said Brawley. "You need to realize how you label something for one disease or another disease is not exactly not written in stone."

For example, Brawley said an attempt in the 1960s to treat breast cancer by attaching an estrogen molecule to a leukemia drug never ended up helping breast cancer. But for the next 40 years the drug, estramustine, turned out to be the only effective drug for treating non-hormone responsive metastatic prostate cancer.

Brawley said the examples continue from prostate cancer research helping excessive menstrual bleeding or a leukemia drug helping breast cancer. But that's not to say marketing is the only part of it.

In Brawley's former career as an assistant director at the NCI, he noticed how certain efforts in cancer research promotion have paid off--from a politician who gets the disease funding to the well-organized advocacy groups that get people into clinical trials.

On the government side, Brawley said politicians can use what's called the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings bill to get money for disease research through the Department of Defense. Unlike the NCI, politicians choose to allocate money for a pet cause.

How Some Cancers Get More Research Funding

"Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa wanted to increase breast cancer funding by $200 million in 1990 and Ted Stevens from had prostate cancer, and so he decided to get some money for it," said Brawley.

In addition to having a member of Congress concerned about a disease, Brawley said the activism within certain cancer organizations can attract more federal money by default.

"The National Breast Cancer Coalition under Fran Visco started doing this early. They organized themselves, and their advocates actually go take classes where they learn the science," said Brawley.

Brawley said the initiatives got women into more clinical trials, helped the coalition lobby for funds and ultimately led to a thriving research field that attracted ambitious doctors.

"As a whole, the prostate cancer groups had not been as committed and loyal to understanding the science as the breast cancer groups have," said Brawley. "I heard 'to hell with the science' so many times in prostate cancer groups."

Brawley said prostate cancer clinical trials failed while numerous clinical trials in breast cancer treatment were revolutionizing the standard of care from an extreme mastectomy, into less extreme mastectomies, into lumpectomies, where women keep most of their breast tissues. But the difference was a problem with finding male volunteers.

"Three times we had to shut trials down because men won't go into the studies," he said.

Doctors advocating for more bladder cancer research dollars are well aware of these social and logistical hurdles. But they're still fighting.

"It's not something that Ryan Seacrest is going to get," said Dr. Gary Steinberg, chairperson on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network. Steinberg said about 80 percent of his bladder cancer patients are blue-collar workers in industrial fields.

That lack of publicity, Steinberg said, ultimately leads to later diagnoses.

"Patients will have blood in their urine, and they'll be treated with an antibiotic. Their physician might say, 'Oh, it's a urinary tract infection,' and they'll give more antibiotics without examining them," he said.

"All too often by the time patients have been diagnosed with bladder cancer, there's been a 12-13 month delay after the symptoms."

Source: ABC News
Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved

Baby born with two heads in Philippines

(AP Photo/Bullit Marquez)

Conjoined twins never cease to amaze me, and this case one is no exception.

A baby girl with two heads was born
in Manila, the Philippines, on Tuesday night.

“Baby Girl Arciaga" was also born with two hearts, though they're contained in one sac. The heads have separate brains (um...duh) and spines, CBS News reported.

The condition is called dicephaly monozygotic conjoined birth, and it occurs in only one out of 80,000 live births.

Doctors at the Philippine Heart Center said an underdeveloped heart threatens could kill the twins, who were also born with neo-natal pneumonia. Their complexion turns dark when they cry because of a hole in one of the hearts.

“Eventually if one heart fails, the other one will be affected,”
said Dr. Ruben Flores, director of Fabella Memorial Hospital, where the twins were born.

He also said it might be impossible to separate the twins because they share one body and most organs.

Might? Um...correct me if I'm wrong, but...ugh...doesn't a head need a body to exist? There are two heads and one body.

The twins are due to undergo a computed tomography angiography so that doctors can get a clearer picture of their physical features before they can finally decide on an operation to separate the conjoined twins.

Am I missing something here?

Ultrasound images before the birth showed only one baby, so the Arciaga couple--whose families have twins on both sides--did not expect twins. I wonder how doctors missed the second head. Heads are measured during ultrasounds to determine how far along the pregnancy is and keep track of the fetus' development.

Salvador Arciaga, the twins’ father, earns a meager income as a tricycle driver, so he appealed to the public for financial assistance, CBS News reported.

“Please help our baby. Please support us and help us extend their lives,” he said.

The Arciagas could only hope that their twins end up like Abigail and Brittany Hensel of Minnesota, who for 19 years have been living with one body. They can walk, run, ride a bicycle, and even drive. I've seen documentaries about these amazing girls.

According to the University of Maryland Medical Center, the overall survival rate of conjoined twins is somewhere between 5% and 25%, CBS reported.

Source: CBS News
Copyright © 2009, Primetime Oracle
All Rights Reserved